When it comes to A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) the implications of recent advances in Artificial Intelligence have spurred heated debate globally and for very good reason. When you begin to look at the factual implications of A.I. the rubber meets the road at the end of the day. As you begin to do the digging on this topic the warts and all start to come out so in this piece we can take a look at how these pieces begin to fit together in the real world. As science fiction transforms into science fact in front of our eyes and becomes our reality.
A.I. products are slowly infiltrating homes and workplaces at breakneck speed. This is now raising concerns about the possible potential detrimental effects of A.I. on the job market, modern day or even about the dangers of an A.I. singularity, where sentient robots take over the world and destroy humans which with the way things are developing today this is getting dangerously close to becoming a real situation. Later on in this article we will point out some of the links as to how this just might pan out but always with the proof to back up the claim.
While these points are all valid for discussions, I feel that the focus of A.I.“should”not be just on cool home gadget or on process optimisation and automation. Instead, A.I. could be used to fundamentally rethink how we solve the world’s problems. In an ideal world this might be the case but as things stand currently we have a lot of the solutions to the world’s problems already and the threat, at this point is coming from the implementation of A.I. itself.
Although A.I. has the potential to improve things like healthcare, education, poverty and security in general. A.I. machines can do some very beneficial things already today that humans will simply never be able to especially at breakneck speeds. If we allow that leverage to accelerate A.I. could positively impact society, business, and culture on the order of magnitude never before seen and not just on the internet itself but we will still have to build in (in my opinion) a kill switch.
We as human we process millions of sensory inputs automatically and constantly, allowing us to learn and respond to our environment. But the human brain only contains about 300 million pattern processors that are responsible for human thought so what if the A.I. began to use trillions of calculations a second? Adding to this what if the A.I. became self aware? What if we could amalgamate all of our amazing ideas with not just more data, but also orders of magnitude more data processing capability? Imagine how we would have to rethink every single problem that exists today with the correct knowledge. Think how the world would change overnight!
With today’s primitive level of A.I., there is more than enough technology out there to start doing exactly this. The examples below draw from a variety of industries to illustrate the magnitude of social impact possible when we couple A.I. with human skill and ingenuity.
- Precision Medicine
A.I. is driving the adoption and implementation of precision medicine: an emerging approach for disease treatment and prevention that takes into account individual variability in genes, D.N.A. environment, and lifestyle for each person. Think of it as a type of medical personalisation. For example, around 25,000 people in the US are diagnosed with brain tumours every year so A.I. might be able to help with this for example. Precision medicine could allow doctors and researchers to pool and predict more accurately which treatment and prevention strategies for a particular disease will work in which groups of people.
Many of the answers lie in the vast amount of medical data already collected but not all of it is made accessible to the public.Ayasdi uses A.I. algorithms likedeep learning to enable doctors and hospitals to better analyse their data. Through their work, medical practitioners have been able to identify previously unknown diabetes sub-typesthat could lead to better therapies that can work better for certain types of patients rather than others.
There were around707 million cybersecurity breaches in 2015, with554 million in just the first half of 2016. The impact of just a few of these attacks, such as foreign governments potentially biasing US presidential elections, is truly scary.
Security teams struggle today to work through the increasing number of alerts generated by traditional tools so it is imaginable that in the same way these types of A.I. could be used to defend systems it could also be used to breech them.
The self-learning and automation capabilities enabled by A.I. can increase effectiveness and reduce costs, keeping us much safer from terrorism or even smaller scale identity theft but we have to remember who or what the real threat is. A tool can be used for both good and bad after all. A gun never shot anyone the person using it did.
A.I. based solutions are already in the big wide world and can be more proactive and can pre-empt attacks in the pre-execution state by identifying patterns and anomalies associated with malicious content.
- A Conscious Warning
Pretty much of this article has been predominantly about the A.I. aspect but let us take a look a little deeper into this aspect for a moment and at the same time look at some of the additional aspects to the bigger picture. Let’s start with the word, government which is one example to look at first off. What does it mean? Well the black’s law dictionary has the definition of this as the following:
“The regulation, restraint, supervision, or control which is exercised upon the individual members of an organized jural society by those invested with the supreme political authority, for the good and welfare of the body politic; or the act of exercising supreme political power or control.” – rendan Wilde – www.umbrellar.com
Which is point number one. This means there are means in place to control all of the people if very simply put. Those who wish to enforce total control will make every effort to do just that no matter what this may involve.
Point number two: What could happen if “government was replaced by A.I.?” If this were the case how would we be affected and to what degree? There are many aspects to this but for an example let us look at point number three:
Cloud based computing and how the cloud is integrating with the A.I. on the internet as we speak. Ok we can see this is a feasible aspect so we move on. R.F.I.D. chips that are implantable. If we then move on to the next aspect we will find there are ways to connect the RFID’s to the net via the internet. Radio Frequency Identification. I.e remote connection to the internet via radio frequency signals. So the next step is to connect the individuals brain to the chip which is being mandated via vaccinations through the W.H.O through the vaccination program.
Then comes the last but not least step to connecting all people to the A.I. on the web remotely and on this note we should all be aware of the reality of the A.I. and why we need to be aware of the situation as it unfolds step by step.
There is one key to the end of this post and those who read it will absolutely see where it is going. This is why we all must look at the A.I. situation and remain alert to the fact we could end up being plugged into the A.I. net once and for all and for good. Forbes information in this last link was written with contributions from Lauren Taylor, Principal Consultant in Frost & Sullivan’s Visionary Innovation Group. The information contained in this piece is based on sound science and factual data as well as the professional research behind all of it.
Ford’s labour law rollbacks are another blow against Ontario workers
Announcing plans for new labour legislation, a beaming Premier Doug Ford assured us earlier this month that “we’re going to make sure we’re competitive around the world.”
At first glance, that statement might lead us to believe the premier, especially given his commitment to act “for the people,” was vowing Ontario would make sure its workers got as good a deal, or better, than workers elsewhere in the world.
But that’s not what he meant at all.
In fact, he meant just the opposite — that he would ensure our workers got a worse deal than workers elsewhere.
That is the perverse thinking behind the economic philosophy that has dominated North American politics in recent decades: that workers must offer themselves up at the lowest possible wage with the fewest possible benefits in order to create an attractive investment climate for businesses that might otherwise move elsewhere.
Despite the persistence of this theory, there’s little evidence to support it: most low-wage countries remain that way, while the high-wage nations of Europe and Scandinavia continue to excel in global competitiveness. Undeterred, Doug Ford is rolling back labour legislation, updated last year after a two-year review with extensive public consultations, and replacing it with a bill hastily assembled behind closed doors, with heavy business input.
Gone is the minimum wage hike to $15 an hour. So, just like that, faster than you can say “for the people,” Ford has cancelled what amounted to a $2,000 annual pay increase that was headed for the pockets of the lowest-paid people.
He’s also cancelling the two paid sick days a year, even though 145 countries (most of the world’s nations) already offer some form of paid sick leave. Think how competitive we’ll be without it! That should give us a leg-up on Guatemala and Botswana!
Business commentators argued that the higher minimum wage would drive businesses elsewhere, presumably leaving Canadian customers happily ordering their coffee-to-go from far-away places. Commentators made the same argument last year, when the minimum wage was raised to $14 an hour. However, Ontario’s unemployment rate fell to 5.4 per cent, its lowest level in 18 years.
Killing the $15 minimum wage is another victory in the long-running class war, sometimes called neoliberalism, in which business-funded think-tanks have shaped the public debate, convincing us we must design our economy to please business interests.
And we’ve done that, slashing taxes on corporations and the rich, signing trade deals designed to protect corporate rights, weakening labour laws and making it harder for workers to organize into unions.
The result has been … well, pretty much what you’d expect when all economic laws have been redesigned to benefit the elite.
In his new book, The Age of Increasing Inequality, Dalhousie University economist Lars Osberg notes that the incomes of the top 1 per cent have doubled since 1982.
Meanwhile, the bottom half of Canadians, some 13.5 million people, are earning less than they did in 1982 (in inflation-adjusted dollars), Osberg shows. Only Canada’s social safety net — child, disability, welfare benefits, etc. — prevents them from actually being worse off than they were in the early 1980s.
Of course, the neoliberals have been shredding the safety net as well.
Ford has moved quickly to diminish Ontario’s safety net, ending the Basic Income project and making cuts to social assistance. Among other things, it now reportedly takes longer for those on disability to qualify for a wheelchair. Ford is planning an additional $6 billion in spending cuts.
In an analysis done before last spring’s election, economic consultant Edgardo Sepulveda projected that the NDP’s platform would reduce inequality “moderately” and the Liberal platform would reduce it “slightly,” but Ford’s PC platform would move the province in exactly the opposite direction, increasing inequality “significantly.”
Given the speed and scope of Ford’s changes already, Sepulveda now believes that inequality in the province will increase “even more and faster.”
So, after decades of losing ground to the elite, millions of Canadians will find themselves falling behind deeper and faster under Doug Ford.
On the bright side, think of how competitive we’ll be. In the race to the bottom, nobody beats Ontario!
Linda McQuaig is a journalist and author. Her book Shooting the Hippo: Death by Deficit and Other Canadian Myths was among the books selected by the Literary Review of Canada as the “25 most influential Canadian books of the past 25 years.” This column originally appeared in the Toronto Star.
CamSoda creates crypto currency controlled phone sex service
Porn company, CamSoda, has created a phone sex service that’s controlled by major crypto currencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum and Litecoin.
The service, Bitcast, tracks the real-time USD value of cryptocurrencies Bitcoin, Ethereum and Litecoin, via a chart and then syncs it with a string of internet-connected Lovense sex toys. The vibration on the sex toy is controlled by the current market value of the cryptocurrencies. If it goes up, the vibrations increase—dropping in sync with a decrease in value.
The Lovense sex toy line has a range of internet enabled Fleshlights, dildos, prostrate massagers, discreet buttplugs and vibrators.
“The excitement surrounding cryptocurrency could only be hotter if it brought investors to climax,” said Daryn Parker, vice president of CamSoda.
“Now, in addition to the euphoria investors receive from their investment starting to take off, they’ll be able to simultaneously get off. Tracking your investment has never been more fun. It’s the ultimate high, the ultimate experience and it’s what we’re all about here at CamSoda,” he continued.
According to a CamSoda spokesperson, the Bitcast service obtains its data from popular cryptocurrency trading platform, Bitstamp. The current prices of cryptocurrencies traded on
CamSoda had previously released several tech sex services such as Ocast and OhRama.
My life as a Babestation TV phone sex presenter
Former glamour model and Babestation TV phone sex presenter, Rebecca Emslie, has described her experiences working for the adult channel.
The 34-year-old, who currently resides in Llaneli, quit her adult TV career following the birth of her five-year-old son. With a following of nearly 40,000 on Twitter, Emslie worked as a personal trainer for the past year, and recently finished an indoor triathlon for Children in Need.
Prior to starting a career in front of cameras, Emslie had a more modest job, yet harbored ambitions to enter the glamour industry.
“I was a sales manager at Communications Direct before I went to work at Babestation,” said Emslie.
“I had breast augmentation and decided to have a portfolio done to see if I could break into the world of glamour. While I was at a photoshoot, the photographer suggested Babestation. At the time I hadn’t seen it, or even heard of it.”
“I looked them up on MySpace and sent them a message; they asked me to send some pictures over. I soon received a reply and I went to London for an interview at the studios, I was then asked back to do a few trial shifts and it just went from there. I left my office job to do it full time,” she continued.
According to Emslie, despite slots on the show being sought after by models, she didn’t have any fierce competition.
“To be honest I really didn’t find it competitive at all. I think every channel I have worked for had their favourites but we all used to get along it wasn’t bitchy or anything like that! It was a relaxed, fun environment,” she revealed.
While numerous critics have been demeaning the show, Emslie disagrees with them.
“I think to be successful in the industry to start with you have to be confident with showing off your body and not let anyone else’s opinions of what you do for a living affect you,” she said.
Most of the girls also had to frequently travel to show locations from their various homes.
“When I first started working in London I didn’t drive so I would usually get the train from Wales to London, so it would take me half the day to get there,” said Emslie.
“I’d arrive in London about 5pm grab some food and make my way to the studio to get ready and be live on air for 9pm.”
“I’d work until 6am and sometimes travel straight back. But after a few months I had built up few months I had built up a fan base and I was given more shifts, so I shared an apartment with another girl and I’d do a block of 3-4 shifts back-to-back. I would just stay up in London while I was working then go back to Wales.”
Emslie noted that the girls were protected from callers who intend to discuss subjects they’re uncomfortable with.
“I never did anything I wasn’t comfortable with and I never spoke about things that were classed as a taboo subject. I would tell the caller we couldn’t talk about that, and if they continued to carry on with the subject I’d have the call terminated,” she said.
She also remarked that the callers were a lot different from public perception, as they weren’t “old pervy men, but callers of all ages, from 18 years onwards. They mostly have girlfriends or partners, or are married.”
Emslie said that she enjoyed the freedom the job provided away from regular 9-5’s, and that she had further opportunities for more work.
“I did get offers to do other work outside of Babestation studios,” she said.
“I did stuff for papers, lad mags, and online stuff. I also got chosen to be a ring girl for the boxing with a few of the other girls from Babestation. I also had my own member’s website which I had taken down about a year ago after leaving the industry.”
“When I working for another channel I was asked to do more x-rated stuff but I never went down that path for me Babestation TV was my limit in how far I would go – topless only. I never wanted to go take things further even if the money was better.”
According to Emslie, it was also quite easy for her to separate her work from her private life.
“Business and personal life was always kept separate,” she said. “As soon as I was on that bed ready to go live I would be in character of Rebecca Jade. It never affected my personal life; work was work and I’m not like that in real life.”
“I don’t want to go name-dropping but I have been to a few private parties with some famous people. I’ve partied with footballers, boxers, big-name DJs, a well-known music producer/songwriter and people from reality TV.”
“Yes I would often get unwanted attention, but unfortunately that comes with the nature of the job. It’s one of those things I just learned to get along with.”