Humanity is only ever one blackout away from the caves. The more advanced and complicated a civilisation, the easier it is to destroy. Far from heeding this long-acknowledged fact, modern nations have decided to hinge their essential services on the deceptively fragile digital world.
In other words, we gave ourselves an ‘off’ switch.
There is a significant difference between storing data on a local physical drive and trusting the elusive ‘cloud’. As Millennials learn the first time they wander out of reception, the music they stream to their phone is only available while they remain connected to the digital hive. So it is with governments and corporations, who long ago ditched the expense of personal servers in favour of rented cloud space, leaving their data at the mercy of (usually foreign) third parties.
We are starting to feel the flickers of failure.
Blackouts. Service disruption. Data breaches. These are the ripples of instability that signify a grander problem with the system. This is not a case of locating the problematic stone dropped into the pond, but rather understanding that the digital fabric which underpins our lives is being disrupted by different people for different reasons.
Those who exploit the digital environment for profit are not a threat to the ecosystem. They are predators who have no interest in destroying their hunting grounds. We have lived with them from the earliest days of the internet where rogue hackers compete against the market in a digital arms race.
The ones we need to watch are those who manufacture an environment of fear. They sell us the lie that digital authoritarianism equals safety in order to shift global ethics away from individual liberty and into the arms of collective governance. They insist that technology is the path to security, forcing the digitisation of our lives. While social media companies stalk us for profit, we are entering an age where the government tracks us for ‘safety’.
This is something we have seen before.
‘Apocalypse politics’ is the favourite tool of the World Economic Forum. Nothing reveals the historical illiteracy of our modern leaders quite like their gullibility regarding this matter. Fear mongering is the oldest trick in the book when it comes to coercing civilisations into stupid decisions, and Western leaders have been sucked into the sandwich-board preaching of billionaires and mad-men.
Democracies are notoriously difficult to control. Their frequent election cycles mean that the promises of one political leader are meaningless in the context of long term projects. Like the endless treaties signed and destroyed between the kings of England and France, global bureaucracies run by rusted old socialists have thus far been thwarted by the instability of Western government.
However, even democracies are required to have a dangerous piece of fine print known as the ‘war economy’. It is a heightened state of survival where the norms of democracy are set aside to deal with the imminent threat of existential destruction. Previously free citizens submit to virtual enslavement and the whims of the state become unquestioned law for the duration of the war effort on the understanding that this sacrifice is a temporary measure. The longer it endures, the more damage is done.
The purpose of climate change, Covid, and the newly hyped ‘digital pandemic’ is to artificially induce a permanent war economy within democratic nations onto which global treaties can be grafted. It is no accident that domestic leaders talk about Covid and climate change as a ‘war’ that we must fight ‘together’. This is a crucial piece of legal language used to override democratic rights. If this carries on, international standards cooked up between bureaucracies and corporations will eventually replace legislation. That is what is meant by phrases like, ‘Build Back Better’, ‘The Great Reset’, ‘changing mindsets’, ‘redefining capitalism’, ‘The Fourth Industrial Revolution’, ‘we’re all in this together’, and ‘sustainable future’. It is the maintenance of fear to justify the antiquated socialist dream of a global bureaucracy.
Klaus Schwab has never met an apocalypse he didn’t like. Upon first glance, the founder of the World Economic Forum appears to be one white cat away from a standard-issue Bond villain. His hefty German accent, penchant for cult-like ceremonial robes, and endless ‘world domination’ podium ramblings are comical to the point that the press wrongly dismissed his ambitions for our global collective future as a conspiracy theory.
The World Economic Forum has used this media disinterest to its advantage, growing its vast network of followers out of sight to the point where its influence not only interferes with domestic politics -– it writes global geopolitics. This status was achieved via the consolidation of the world’s biggest corporations, bureaucracies, individuals, and politicians into a cult of narcissism who love the idea that their ideological collusion erases the pesky free will of the peasant masses.
Tyrant Dr. Chant: COVID Will Be With Us ‘Forever’ & People Will Have To ‘Get Used To’ Endless Booster Vaccines
The New South Wales Chief Health Officer made the alarming comments during a recent press conference.
“We need to get used to being vaccinated with COVID vaccines for the future … I can’t see COVID is not going to be with us forever,” said Chant said during a press conference last week.
“As a public health doctor we always want to have diseases go, to be totally eliminated, but that is not on the horizon in the near future,” she continued. “Booster doses and repeat doses will be part of it.”
“I can assure you that the commonwealth government has purchased large quantities of vaccine into 2022 and this will be a regular cycle of vaccination and revaccination as we learn more about when immunity wanes.”
In a separate answer to a reporter, Chant again asserted that people “will be getting vaccinated regularly” against COVID.
The devil has spoken! “What I really need to do is get that second dose into people.”
Given that Australians were previously told authorities “wouldn’t hesitate” to go door to door to carry out COVID tests, what’s to stop them doing the same thing for vaccines?
As we previously highlighted, the infamously stern-faced Chant previously warned Aussies that they shouldn’t even be talking to their own friends and neighbors, even if they’re wearing a mask.
“Whilst it’s human nature to engage in conversation with others, to be friendly, unfortunately this is not the time to do that,” said Chant.
“So even if you run into your next door neighbour in the shopping center… don’t start up a conversation, now is the time for minimizing your interactions with others, even if you’ve got a mask, do not think that affords total protection,” she added.
Tyrannical Australia Wants To Force Citizens To Report Their Location ON DEMAND Via Government Tracking App
The revelation was highlighted in an Atlantic piece by Conor Friedersdorf which questions whether Australia can still call itself a liberal democracy in light of the crippling restrictions it has placed on its own population.
With no end in sight for the lifting of the country’s brutal lockdown, Aussies could face even more invasive state intrusion into their private lives under the justification of stopping the spread of the virus.
The South Australian government is preparing to roll out an app that “will contact people at random asking them to provide proof of their location within 15 minutes,” according to reports.
If people refuse to report their location or are unable to do so, police are then dispatched to hunt them down.
“We don’t tell them how often or when, on a random basis they have to reply within 15 minutes,” said Premier Steven Marshall.
This is barely much different from literally fitting people with electronic ankle bracelets that track their every movement like prisoners under home arrest, a policy that was actually considered by Australian authorities earlier this year.
“No matter your views of COVID, what’s happening in Australia is alarming, extreme and dangerous,” remarked journalist Glenn Greenwald.
As we have exhaustively highlighted, Australia has enforced one of the most draconian lockdowns in the world in an effort to pursue a disastrous ‘zero COVID’ strategy.
Last month, the Premier of Victoria asserted that authorities “won’t hesitate” to go “door-to-door” to carry out mandatory COVID tests on Australians.
Aussies were also ordered not to talk to each other, even while wearing masks, while people who merely post anti-lockdown information online could also face fines of up to $11,000 dollars under an absurdly authoritarian new law.
What You Should Know About Climate Change, Covid, Control And Criminals
If anyone says to you “the weather extremes are a sure sign of global warming”, it’s because they take this information directly from the media and assume it to be fact.
The media get it from government – or government ‘expert advisors’. The ‘expert advisors’ get it from a computer modelling exercise (e.g. Imperial College London).
The computer modelling exercise gets it from a large financial incentive offered by the corporate conglomerate and bought-out government, with the explicit instruction to produce a result which fills the needs of their combined political goals. In this case, to magic-up ‘scientific proof’ that global warming is real.
The need to have ‘proof’ that this invention is real is arrived at in spite of the fact that global warming’s main proponents know that the idea was dreamed-up at the Club of Rome in 1972 under a widely publicised treatise with the catchy title ‘Limits to Growth’.
It gained a further boost from the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, when the infamous Agenda 21 was launched to impose largely irrational environmental constrictions as a forerunner to the highly discriminating ‘carbon taxes’ in operation today.
Limits to Growth might have appealed to those who oppose neo-liberal capitalist insistence on the necessity for a ‘permanent growth’ economy; but the real intent behind those words is the conditioning of the receiver to take a self-imposed pseudo-sacrificial attitude about ‘limitation’.
Ergo, limiting one’s self for the sake of a ‘higher cause’ – saving the natural environment from Global Warming!
This form of ‘austerity-conditioning’ becomes the perfect precept for encouraging naturally concerned citizens to not just embrace cutting back the typical material excesses of their lives, but ultimately the pseudo-saintly renunciation of all material interests.
The ghoulish plan behind Klaus Schwab’s quasi religious Sermon from the Mount WEF:
Schwab’s psycho-social engineering ‘deep mind experts’ having planned-out the precise stepping stones necessary for a ‘check-mate’ seamless handing-over of all private wealth to the insatiably materialistic elite masters of deception. A thoroughly odious yet quite brilliant sleight of hand.
The great ‘Global Warming’ alarm was raised as a calculated way for leading industrialists, bankers and royalty to ensure their future as the premier influencers and controllers of global affairs.
Blanket controlled media indoctrination, using rampant fear mongering as its key component, is designed to convert public sentiment to the cause. The elite industrialist club know full well that ‘fear’ makes desperate people turn to their perceived leaders to protect them – and tell them what to do. The historical precedent for this is ubiquitous.
The notion that the climate was dangerously warming had no scientific evidence to back it up. That was cooked-up later under the auspices of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
It is more than unfortunate that the great majority of green-oriented NGOs also swallowed the bait and, being by then mostly well funded by corporate-backed governments, took the money, closed their eyes and minds – and jumped on board – thus embracing the deadly distortion of their original green commitments.
It is now the turn of Klaus Schwab (director of World Economic Forum) to take up the reins handed down to him by earlier representatives of the small but powerful elite that runs planetary affairs via such puppet heads of state as Bush, Cheney, Blair – and other aspiring despots of that time.