Connect with us

Headline News

Ottawa Lawyers: Seeking to Oppress Women and Disabled People? Try John Summers

greenbay

Published

on

Are you an abusive husband who treats your wife very badly?

Does your wife also happen to be a disabled “old lady”?

Maybe you don’t like feeding her and every now and then you like to raise the back of your hand to her to keep her “disciplined”?

Maybe you neglected her to the point that she became sick and crippled?

Maybe you also want to keep her adult children or other relatives from seeing her?

After all, shouldn’t you be able to abuse your wife without their interference?

If this sounds like you, why not try out John Summers at Bell Baker in Ottawa?

He will seek to ignore Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure if you need to go to court and to otherwise manipulate the court system so you can continue to neglect or abuse your wife in peace and quiet. Isn’t that your right as a man?

His staff will berate you with phone calls demanding that you ignore court rules.

He will if necessary, with a smile. also apparently conjure up affidavits with questionable claims with no verifiable evidence backed by lies made to the Police.


What a fabulous ambassador to the law profession in Ottawa this guy is?

You don’t have any actual evidence to defend yourself? No worries.

When you’re an expert at manipulating the court system and jerking around judges who are there to protect the integrity of the courts, there’s no need to have evidence is there?

When you don’t have evidence, did you know that you can just make up a variety of colourful lies? Just tell the local police lies that any pesky relative who seeks to defend your wife is a terrorist, or just make up the he or she is “mentally ill”.

If you decide to fabricate the story that a relative who witnessed your wife getting beat up or slapped suffers from “mentally illness” I hear that John Summers over at Bell Baker will defend your public mischief to the police.

If you are willing to pay, there’s no need to be truthful now, is there?

It just goes to show how much certain members of the law profession may be willing to sell out the integrity of the profession to the highest bidders.

According to some lawyers apparently, “the truth” is overrated. Why establish the truthfulness of your client, when you help spin a good lie, if you’re client is willing to pay? If lives suffer, as a result, who cares?

Poor and disenfranchised women including the elderly are being oppressed because certain members of the law profession are apparently willing to prostitute themselves to the oppressive behaviours of men who are able to use their physical dominance to oppress and terrorize their spouses.

Unfortunately elderly women, unlike younger women, lack any specific organization in Ottawa specifically and Canada in general to defend their legal rights from abusers.

Elderly women who have had their money controlled by their more able-bodied men are the most oppressed and non-represented group in Canada.

Just look at the above video involving Mr Summers’ client.

Son goes to the door to see his Mom with the support of the police.

Able-bodied husband comes to the door, and prevents both police and the son from seeing a sick, and elderly woman who can no longer talk because Mr. Summers’ client denied this woman getting speech therapy that was recommended by a doctor at the Bruyere Hospital in downtown Ottawa.

What kind of human being could defend the thwarting of police seeking to enable a Court order of a son by a human being lacking in human decency, ethics, empathy and morality? But such is apparently the state of our society where exploitation is justified, and the pain and suffering of the innocent continue.

And what is the state of the local Ottawa media that abusive able bodied men can just barricade themselves into their domicile for over a year without regard to the civil rights of disabled and elderly women, and free from media scrutiny?

The local Ottawa media will more likely cover human rights abroad in some Muslim country far away than the abuses that take place in their own backyard as media organizations like the CBC and CTV chase their local “feel good” stories.

As for lawyers, who cares about the elderly? After all, you’re not expected to have empathy or be concerned about the advancement of “justice” if you can sell yourself to the highest bidder… right?

For the abusive men who often control the financial resources of their spouses into old age, there are apparently lawyers who are willing to be parasitize the sadistic and delinquent behaviours of miscreants and criminals in order to line their pockets.

Such lawyers are not shy in living off “Blood Money” that had been extracted at the expense of the lives of others including the most sick and vulnerable of society. No lie is too heinous as long as it brings sought money into the firm.

It is apparent that some lawyer have apparently no shame. Let justice “go to Hell” as long as there’s Blood Money out there that is available for the taking.

Apparently, justice be damned!

Read more…

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headline News

ShoutIt.ca: A new free speech social media platform changing the face of censorship

greenbay

Published

on

In the wake of the violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building in the days leading up to the just concluded Presidential election, social media giants have been on a strict censorship campaign.

Quite a number of high-profile personalities, notably former President Donald Trump, have had their social media accounts permanently suspended for airing views that were deemed “inappropriate” and “inciting violence”. However, there have been accusations that this censorship by social media giants such as Facebook, Twitter and Snapchat have been biased and targeted towards conservative voices and activists.

To combat the problem of selective censorship, a new free speech and human rights social media network is giving users such as Trump, the platform to express themselves freely without fear of censorship. ShoutIt.ca is a community-driven social network and not-for-profit initiative with the primary goal of providing a free speech platform for those seeking an alternative to social media sites such as Twitter and Facebook, which has been riddled with worsening censorship.

In a statement following Trump’s ban from Twitter, the company noted that the decision to ban Trump permanently from the platform was due to his continued violation of their terms of use by inciting violence and therefore, a suspension would minimize the risk of further violence.

By far his most preferred platform, Twitter was Trump’s primary mode of communication since assuming office and through this medium, he has made several policy announcements and commented on different societal and political issues. But with his account suspended, communicating becomes quite a struggle and this has led many conservatives to seek alternatives to these major social networks.

“(The social media platforms) have overwhelmingly censored Trump and his administration,” said Lon Safko, industry consultant and author of The Social Media Bible in a report.  

“Any form of censorship, any form, is unacceptable. Social platform such as Facebook, whose primary business is open communication between its over 2.7 billion members, have a moral and legal responsibility to allow those conversations to transpire, organically.”

All sides of a conversation must be heard and if any viewer disagrees or takes offence by a certain conversation, they are well within their rights to ignore the conversation and walk away.  ShoutIt.ca gives everyone the freedom to express themselves, increasing public engagement and awareness on various topic. Also, it limits the level of cultural, political and religious intolerance.

Continue Reading

Headline News

Individual Rights and Freedoms Under Siege in Era of COVID

greenbay

Published

on

In a letter to 100,000 lawyers, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Children’s Health Defense (CHD) chairman and chief legal counsel, urges his fellow attorneys to read “Protecting Individual Rights in the Era of COVID-19,” a special report prepared by the CHD team.

The report explores the legal rights to informed consent, bodily integrity, the right to refuse unwanted medical interventions, religious expression and autonomy. All of these rights will be “dramatically constricted” if employers, states and/or the federal government impose vaccine mandates.

Dear Colleague,

The COVID-19 pandemic has proven an opportunity of convenience for totalitarian elements who have put individual rights and freedoms globally under siege. A medical cartel composed of pharmaceutical industry, government regulators, financial houses, and telecom and internet billionaires are systematically obliterating freedom of speech and assembly, religious worship, property rights, jury trial, due process, and — ultimately — America’s exemplary democracy.

That’s why I am sending you this new Special Report, “Protecting Individual Rights in the Era of COVID-19.”

As a fellow lawyer who has practiced in our country’s courts for more than 40 years, I am alarmed by the growing power of global corporations to overwhelm our justice system, obliterate our constitutional liberty, and destroy public health. Throughout my career as a litigator, law professor, public advocate and author, I have worked to hold corporate giants and government institutions accountable. My life’s work has provided me with a unique perspective on our individual rights to clean air, clean water, unobstructed access to the commons, and our rights to make our own decisions about our bodies.

As chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), I have now dedicated myself to protecting children’s health by ending harmful environmental exposures to children, ending the exploding chronic disease epidemic that has debilitated over half of American kids born after 1989, and to holding those responsible accountable.

A 2006 Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) study found that 54% of America’s children today have chronic health conditions — allergies, ADHD, autism, eczema, asthma, obesity, autoimmune conditions and more. When I was growing up, most of these conditions were rare or unknown. When I was a boy, I received three vaccines. Today, children receive 72 mandated doses of 16 vaccines, prior to age 18. A mountain of peer-reviewed studies points to vaccines as the primary culprit in this public health calamity. That isn’t stopping our health authorities from mandating more hugely subsidized, shoddily tested, zero-liability vaccines for children. Our vaccine safety program falls dangerously short of what our children deserve.

The COVID-19 pandemic has allowed captive corporate regulators to hold the population hostage to justify the transfer of $45 billion of taxpayer money to pharmaceutical companies to finance a gold rush of new vaccines.

Protecting individual rights in the era of COVID-19 is essential 

I urge you to read this short legal dossier, “Protecting Individual Rights in the Era of COVID-19”, with an open mind and to draw your own conclusion about the legal and ethical implications of one-size-fits-all vaccine mandates for zero-liability, heavily subsidized mandatory vaccines.

Current vaccine mandates now require most school children to receive between 50-75 shots just to attend school. A vaccine-injured child, or adult, cannot sue the healthcare provider or the vaccine producer — but rather must go to a rigged national injury compensation program to sue the very government that ordered vaccine compliance in the first place. After studying this subject for years, I am more horrified than ever by the system’s pervasive corruption.

Given existing federal legislation and judicial precedents, it is all but impossible to hold vaccine manufacturers or healthcare providers accountable for vaccine injury in the courts. Vaccine injuries are not rare — HHS’s own studies show that the agency claims that injuries only occur with “1 in a million” vaccines is a mendacious canard. The true injury rate is actually 1 in every 39 vaccines, according to the Federal Agency for Health Research Quality.

Problems with vaccine safety aren’t isolated just to children 

Federal and State officials are considering mandates for the new COVID-19 vaccine. The New York State Bar Association, an organization for which I have great respect, has given its imprimatur to a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for all New Yorkers if “experts” deem that necessary. But those experts are mainly regulators from captured public health agencies with pervasive and corrupt financial entanglements with pharmaceutical manufacturers.

The pharma-controlled media’s advice that we “trust the experts” is anti-democratic and anti-science. You and I know that “experts” can differ on scientific questions and that their opinions can vary in accordance with and demands of politics, power, and financial self-interest. In every lawsuit, leading, highly credentialed experts from opposite sides routinely offer diametrically antithetical positions based on the same set of facts. The trouble is that today, in the political arena, dissenting voices that question government policies and corporate proclamations are silenced by censorship and vilification.

In this special report, our CHD Team explores the legal rights to informed consent, bodily integrity, the right to refuse unwanted medical interventions, religious expression and autonomy. All of these rights will be dramatically constricted if employers, states and/or the federal government impose vaccine mandates.

I hope that “Protecting Individual Rights in the Era of COVID-19” can help you work with any future clients as you navigate the uncertain COVID-19/vaccine mandates landscape.

Sincerely yours,

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Chairman, Children’s Health Defense

Continue Reading

Headline News

Big Tech Pushes Digital ID Cards to Track Vaccinations, Shopping, Banking Activity and More

greenbay

Published

on

Story at-a-glance:

  • Tech giants with deep ties to the U.S. national security state — Microsoft, Oracle and the MITRE Corporation — have partnered with healthcare companies to create the Vaccination Credential Initiative (VCI) to advance the implementation of digital COVID-19 vaccination records.
  • The initiative is essentially built on a common framework of digital vaccination “wallets” called SMART Health Cards that are meant to “work across organizational and jurisdictional boundaries” as part of a new global vaccination-record infrastructure.
  • SMART Health Cards are expected to include a person’s complete name, gender, birth date, mobile phone number and email address in addition to vaccination information, though it is possible and likely that more personal information will be required as the initiative advances.
  • While the push for combining digital identity with vaccination records and economic activity appears, superficially, to be the effort of various organizations and groups, the same individuals and entities appear time and again, pointing to a coordinated push to not only implement such a system but manufacture consent for such a system among the global population.
  • Coercion is a built-in part of this infrastructure and, if implemented, will be used to modify human behavior to great effect, reaching far beyond just the issue of COVID-19 vaccines.

Tech giants with deep ties to the U.S. national security state — Microsoft, Oracle and the MITRE Corporation — announced that they had partnered with several healthcare companies to create the Vaccination Credential Initiative (VCI) to advance the implementation of digital COVID-19 vaccination records.

According to a Reuters report, the VCI “aims to help people get encrypted digital copies of their immunization records stored in a digital wallet of their choice” because the “current system [of vaccination records] does not readily support convenient access and sharing of verifiable vaccination records.”

The initiative, on its website, notes that the VCI is a public-private partnership “committed to empowering individuals with digital vaccination records” so that participants can “protect and improve their health” and “demonstrate their health status to safely return to travel, work, school and life while protecting their data privacy.”

The initiative is essentially built on a common framework of digital vaccination “wallets” called SMART Health Cards that are meant to “work across organizational and jurisdictional boundaries” as part of a new global vaccination-record infrastructure.

The host of the VCI website and one of the initiative’s key backers is the Commons Project Foundation. That foundation, in partnership with the World Economic Forum (WEF), runs the Common Trust Network, which has three goals that are analogous to those of VCI.

As listed on the WEF website, the network’s goals are (1) to empower individuals by providing digital access to their health information; (2) to make it easier for individuals to understand and comply with each destination’s requirements; and (3) to help ensure that only verifiable lab results and vaccination records from trusted sources are presented for the purposes of cross-border travel and commerce.

To advance these goals, the Common Trust Network is powered by “a global registry of trusted laboratory and vaccination data sources” as well as “standard formats for lab results and vaccination records and standard tools to make those results and records digitally accessible.”

Another, and related, Commons Project Foundation and WEF partnership is CommonPass. CommonPass, which is also supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, is both a framework and an app that “will allow individuals to access their lab results and vaccination records, and consent to have that information used to validate their COVID status without revealing any other underlying personal health information.”

Current members of CommonPass, including JetBlue, Lufthansa, Swiss International Airlines, United Airlines and Virgin Atlantic, are also members of the Common Trust Network. This overlap between the Commons Project Foundation/WEF partnerships and the VCI illustrates that the WEF itself is involved with the VCI, albeit indirectly through their partners at the Commons Project Foundation.

The Commons Project Foundation itself is worth exploring, as its cofounders, Paul Meyer and Bradley Perkins, have long-standing ties to the RAND Corporation, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the International Rescue Committee, as noted by MintPress News.

The IRC, currently run by Tony Blair protégé David Milliband, is developing a biometric ID and vaccination-record system for refugees in Myanmar in cooperation with the ID2020 Alliance, which is partnered with CommonPass backer, the Rockefeller Foundation. In addition, the ID2020 Alliance funds the Commons Project Foundation and is also backed by Microsoft, one of the key companies behind the VCI.

Continue Reading

Trending