Science education standards over climate change
A number of states have worked with organizations over the past several years, including the National Research Council, National Science Teachers Association, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science to develop new standards for science curriculum in public schools.
The result, termed the Next Generation Science Standards, provides states with a chance to update their science education goals so they can focus more on the scientific process. So far, nine states and the District of Columbia have adopted the standards.
However, in Kentucky, the Governor adopted them over the objections of state legislators. In Kansas, the adoption resulted in a lawsuit that sought to block their adoption. Now, in the latest bend, the Wyoming legislature has pre-emptively blocked their use in that state.
The Next-Gen Standards include all the modern understanding of evolution and climate science. The problem is with their content. The lawsuit mentioned above claims that the standards violate religious freedom by compelling students to study evolution.Science
Most interestingly, Wyoming doesn’t appear to have issues with evolution. Instead, climate science appears to be the problem and the issue solely being with the implications of the science.
The Casper Star Tribune reported that Wyoming became the first state to block the use of the Next Generation Science Standards with the use of a last-minute budget provision authored in part by State Representative Matt Teeters.
It quotes him as saying “[The standards] handle global warming as settled science. There’s all kind of social implications involved in that that I don’t think would be good for Wyoming.”
Specifically, Teeters seems to think that having citizens of the state accept climate science would “wreck Wyoming’s economy,” which depends heavily on fossil fuel production.
The article also quotes the Chair of the State Board of Education as saying the board voted to “revise the standards to present climate change as a theory, instead of a fact, and to present the benefits mineral extraction has brought Wyoming.”
Meanwhile, there is ambiguity regarding what the implications of the legislature’s budget provision are. The intent appears to be to compel the State Board to adopt the standards piecemeal, but it’s not clear if it has the power to do so, or if the language was clear enough to produce this result.
Why is it important to accept yourself?
Humans are unique in that we have a keen sense of belonging. But that sense of belonging, however, is hugely mismanaged to the point of not accepting who we are. We go through life hoping we can be more like someone else. And if we do not end up like that person, we become unhappy. If you want to improve your self-esteem, you must first embrace who you are as a person. It will take plenty of courage to accept yourself, just like accepting an outcome from spiny bez depozytu game. But accepting yourself is simply seeing things the way they are and stop comparing yourself with others by showering yourself with some real love and care. In this short walk, let us look at seven (7) reasons why you need to accept yourself.
- You are still being made-Don’t be hard on yourself or say terrible things because you are not perfect. Perfection does not exist. Just try to be the best person you can be.
- Your past makes you who you are. – Your mistakes do not make you who you are. Making mistakes shows that you are a person. Admit that you did something wrong, forgive yourself, learn from it, and move on.
- There is no need to treat you like a copy – Your imperfections help you to stand out in a crowd, while your trials allow you to inspire others. Accept and embrace it. Do not try to escape it.
- Your past errors are a lesson, not a death sentence – Every stage of your life teaches you something. The teachings can be found. Then, figure out how to just be the best version of yourself within this period.
- Your stress levels will be lower – You’ll also have less anxiety because you will not have to look outside yourself for happiness. If you find acceptance and contentment within yourself, you will not need to look outside of yourself for happiness anymore.
- You are more powerful than you know – During a storm, you may feel utterly drained and helpless. Recognize that you are more resilient than you believe and that whatever you are going through will be over in no time flat. You are going to be fine.
- Comparing oneself to others is a waste of time – Comparisons with others are harmful. Every aspect of your trip is custom-made for you. As a result, you will only see and hear what they need you to hear and see.
If you do not accept yourself, the following will happen:
- Insecurities – Self-esteem issues may arise if you don’t accept who you truly are.
- Keeping a false Identity – Trying to be someone you are not a surefire way to lead a fictitious life. Is your life quite different from who you are? If so, it may be time to seek help. It is time to find a solution!
- A feeling of unhappiness – Neglecting your inner guidance system, your values, and your heart’s aspirations is the result of all the above, and it prevents you from fully experiencing life.
- Being a victim – It is easy to fall prey to the negative of others if you do not accept yourself as you are.
- A lack of self-confidence – When you are unsure of the person you are or what you want, it might lead to low self-confidence. Feeling like a victim can exacerbate this situation even further.
More than anyone else, you need yourself. It does not make a difference what people say about you. But it does matter what you take in for yourself. It does not matter what they think about you. Your opinions about yourself do matter. So, make sure you have good thoughts about yourself and just be yourself.
Ford’s labour law rollbacks are another blow against Ontario workers
Announcing plans for new labour legislation, a beaming Premier Doug Ford assured us earlier this month that “we’re going to make sure we’re competitive around the world.”
At first glance, that statement might lead us to believe the premier, especially given his commitment to act “for the people,” was vowing Ontario would make sure its workers got as good a deal, or better, than workers elsewhere in the world.
But that’s not what he meant at all.
In fact, he meant just the opposite — that he would ensure our workers got a worse deal than workers elsewhere.
That is the perverse thinking behind the economic philosophy that has dominated North American politics in recent decades: that workers must offer themselves up at the lowest possible wage with the fewest possible benefits in order to create an attractive investment climate for businesses that might otherwise move elsewhere.
Despite the persistence of this theory, there’s little evidence to support it: most low-wage countries remain that way, while the high-wage nations of Europe and Scandinavia continue to excel in global competitiveness. Undeterred, Doug Ford is rolling back labour legislation, updated last year after a two-year review with extensive public consultations, and replacing it with a bill hastily assembled behind closed doors, with heavy business input.
Gone is the minimum wage hike to $15 an hour. So, just like that, faster than you can say “for the people,” Ford has cancelled what amounted to a $2,000 annual pay increase that was headed for the pockets of the lowest-paid people.
He’s also cancelling the two paid sick days a year, even though 145 countries (most of the world’s nations) already offer some form of paid sick leave. Think how competitive we’ll be without it! That should give us a leg-up on Guatemala and Botswana!
Business commentators argued that the higher minimum wage would drive businesses elsewhere, presumably leaving Canadian customers happily ordering their coffee-to-go from far-away places. Commentators made the same argument last year, when the minimum wage was raised to $14 an hour. However, Ontario’s unemployment rate fell to 5.4 per cent, its lowest level in 18 years.
Killing the $15 minimum wage is another victory in the long-running class war, sometimes called neoliberalism, in which business-funded think-tanks have shaped the public debate, convincing us we must design our economy to please business interests.
And we’ve done that, slashing taxes on corporations and the rich, signing trade deals designed to protect corporate rights, weakening labour laws and making it harder for workers to organize into unions.
The result has been … well, pretty much what you’d expect when all economic laws have been redesigned to benefit the elite.
In his new book, The Age of Increasing Inequality, Dalhousie University economist Lars Osberg notes that the incomes of the top 1 per cent have doubled since 1982.
Meanwhile, the bottom half of Canadians, some 13.5 million people, are earning less than they did in 1982 (in inflation-adjusted dollars), Osberg shows. Only Canada’s social safety net — child, disability, welfare benefits, etc. — prevents them from actually being worse off than they were in the early 1980s.
Of course, the neoliberals have been shredding the safety net as well.
Ford has moved quickly to diminish Ontario’s safety net, ending the Basic Income project and making cuts to social assistance. Among other things, it now reportedly takes longer for those on disability to qualify for a wheelchair. Ford is planning an additional $6 billion in spending cuts.
In an analysis done before last spring’s election, economic consultant Edgardo Sepulveda projected that the NDP’s platform would reduce inequality “moderately” and the Liberal platform would reduce it “slightly,” but Ford’s PC platform would move the province in exactly the opposite direction, increasing inequality “significantly.”
Given the speed and scope of Ford’s changes already, Sepulveda now believes that inequality in the province will increase “even more and faster.”
So, after decades of losing ground to the elite, millions of Canadians will find themselves falling behind deeper and faster under Doug Ford.
On the bright side, think of how competitive we’ll be. In the race to the bottom, nobody beats Ontario!
Linda McQuaig is a journalist and author. Her book Shooting the Hippo: Death by Deficit and Other Canadian Myths was among the books selected by the Literary Review of Canada as the “25 most influential Canadian books of the past 25 years.” This column originally appeared in the Toronto Star.
3 ways Artificial Intelligence will change the world
When it comes to A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) the implications of recent advances in Artificial Intelligence have spurred heated debate globally and for very good reason. When you begin to look at the factual implications of A.I. the rubber meets the road at the end of the day. As you begin to do the digging on this topic the warts and all start to come out so in this piece we can take a look at how these pieces begin to fit together in the real world. As science fiction transforms into science fact in front of our eyes and becomes our reality.
A.I. products are slowly infiltrating homes and workplaces at breakneck speed. This is now raising concerns about the possible potential detrimental effects of A.I. on the job market, modern day or even about the dangers of an A.I. singularity, where sentient robots take over the world and destroy humans which with the way things are developing today this is getting dangerously close to becoming a real situation. Later on in this article we will point out some of the links as to how this just might pan out but always with the proof to back up the claim.
While these points are all valid for discussions, I feel that the focus of A.I.“should”not be just on cool home gadget or on process optimisation and automation. Instead, A.I. could be used to fundamentally rethink how we solve the world’s problems. In an ideal world this might be the case but as things stand currently we have a lot of the solutions to the world’s problems already and the threat, at this point is coming from the implementation of A.I. itself.
Although A.I. has the potential to improve things like healthcare, education, poverty and security in general. A.I. machines can do some very beneficial things already today that humans will simply never be able to especially at breakneck speeds. If we allow that leverage to accelerate A.I. could positively impact society, business, and culture on the order of magnitude never before seen and not just on the internet itself but we will still have to build in (in my opinion) a kill switch.
We as human we process millions of sensory inputs automatically and constantly, allowing us to learn and respond to our environment. But the human brain only contains about 300 million pattern processors that are responsible for human thought so what if the A.I. began to use trillions of calculations a second? Adding to this what if the A.I. became self aware? What if we could amalgamate all of our amazing ideas with not just more data, but also orders of magnitude more data processing capability? Imagine how we would have to rethink every single problem that exists today with the correct knowledge. Think how the world would change overnight!
With today’s primitive level of A.I., there is more than enough technology out there to start doing exactly this. The examples below draw from a variety of industries to illustrate the magnitude of social impact possible when we couple A.I. with human skill and ingenuity.
- Precision Medicine
A.I. is driving the adoption and implementation of precision medicine: an emerging approach for disease treatment and prevention that takes into account individual variability in genes, D.N.A. environment, and lifestyle for each person. Think of it as a type of medical personalisation. For example, around 25,000 people in the US are diagnosed with brain tumours every year so A.I. might be able to help with this for example. Precision medicine could allow doctors and researchers to pool and predict more accurately which treatment and prevention strategies for a particular disease will work in which groups of people.
Many of the answers lie in the vast amount of medical data already collected but not all of it is made accessible to the public.Ayasdi uses A.I. algorithms likedeep learning to enable doctors and hospitals to better analyse their data. Through their work, medical practitioners have been able to identify previously unknown diabetes sub-typesthat could lead to better therapies that can work better for certain types of patients rather than others.
There were around707 million cybersecurity breaches in 2015, with554 million in just the first half of 2016. The impact of just a few of these attacks, such as foreign governments potentially biasing US presidential elections, is truly scary.
Security teams struggle today to work through the increasing number of alerts generated by traditional tools so it is imaginable that in the same way these types of A.I. could be used to defend systems it could also be used to breech them.
The self-learning and automation capabilities enabled by A.I. can increase effectiveness and reduce costs, keeping us much safer from terrorism or even smaller scale identity theft but we have to remember who or what the real threat is. A tool can be used for both good and bad after all. A gun never shot anyone the person using it did.
A.I. based solutions are already in the big wide world and can be more proactive and can pre-empt attacks in the pre-execution state by identifying patterns and anomalies associated with malicious content.
- A Conscious Warning
Pretty much of this article has been predominantly about the A.I. aspect but let us take a look a little deeper into this aspect for a moment and at the same time look at some of the additional aspects to the bigger picture. Let’s start with the word, government which is one example to look at first off. What does it mean? Well the black’s law dictionary has the definition of this as the following:
“The regulation, restraint, supervision, or control which is exercised upon the individual members of an organized jural society by those invested with the supreme political authority, for the good and welfare of the body politic; or the act of exercising supreme political power or control.” – rendan Wilde – www.umbrellar.com
Which is point number one. This means there are means in place to control all of the people if very simply put. Those who wish to enforce total control will make every effort to do just that no matter what this may involve.
Point number two: What could happen if “government was replaced by A.I.?” If this were the case how would we be affected and to what degree? There are many aspects to this but for an example let us look at point number three:
Cloud based computing and how the cloud is integrating with the A.I. on the internet as we speak. Ok we can see this is a feasible aspect so we move on. R.F.I.D. chips that are implantable. If we then move on to the next aspect we will find there are ways to connect the RFID’s to the net via the internet. Radio Frequency Identification. I.e remote connection to the internet via radio frequency signals. So the next step is to connect the individuals brain to the chip which is being mandated via vaccinations through the W.H.O through the vaccination program.
Then comes the last but not least step to connecting all people to the A.I. on the web remotely and on this note we should all be aware of the reality of the A.I. and why we need to be aware of the situation as it unfolds step by step.
There is one key to the end of this post and those who read it will absolutely see where it is going. This is why we all must look at the A.I. situation and remain alert to the fact we could end up being plugged into the A.I. net once and for all and for good. Forbes information in this last link was written with contributions from Lauren Taylor, Principal Consultant in Frost & Sullivan’s Visionary Innovation Group. The information contained in this piece is based on sound science and factual data as well as the professional research behind all of it.