Connect with us

Headline News 7 types of men women avoid



( Reviews) — In today’s fast moving world, every man wants to date the most gorgeous women around, but most often, guys tend to make some common mistakes, which in turn make them not-so-attractive. So, we have compiled a list of 7 types of men women avoid, so that you can check if you fall in any of those categories. Don’t worry; even if you are one of those men, then you can simply change yourself to be the perfect partner.

We will start in the reverse order:

7. The Misogynist

These types of guys simply can’t avoid spreading their hatred towards female gender; they just can’t stop criticizing women and keeps on making jokes about them.

Why it’s so annoying for women: well, women just don’t like guys who keep on talking about how bad women are. Making fun of women might be a good idea when you are sitting with your friends, but on a date, this is totally a deal breaker. Women would simply strike you out of their list.

How to overcome this behavior: if you are one of those guys, then you must change yourself, because hating the entire gender based on some bad experience is not what women want. You must start exploring the good things, or you might end up with women who will just hate herself for the rest of her life.

6. The self-righteous guy

Well, this guy is all about being judgmental. He might not drink or smoke, but at the same time, he won’t hesitate while preaching women about what is wrong and what’s not.

Why it’s so annoying for women: well, nobody wants to be judged on the first date. She will just find it too annoying.

How to overcome this behavior: if you are a preacher, then you can control your woman a little, once you are in a relationship, but before that you must give her the space she deserves.

5. The Arguer

This guy is all about starting a debate in all the topics he talks. He will not give up until and unless he wins the argument. For him, it’s just a debate class, and he never wants to lose.

Why it’s so annoying for women: women are going for a date, because they want a peaceful time with a man, not for some debate competition. They will always be defensive, and they will never enjoy the company of such a man.

How to overcome this behavior: well, you should relax, and make a list of those points, which you are about to discuss with your date, otherwise you might end up debating with your date. Most of the guys with arguing issues are too nervous and that’s the basic reason for arguing, because they don’t have enough topics to talk about.

4. The Cheap Guy

This guy will always end up talking about how they should manage their budget, and staying tight on their money will make them a millionaire. Ordering the cheapest wine on the menu and saying to no to flowers, is generally what this type of guy does.

Why it’s so annoying for women: women are definitely not looking to spend with someone, who is constantly making them feel as if they are out of money. Women like to spend time with a guy who is not so worried about the money. Being cheap from the first date is simply a no-no for women.

How to overcome this behavior: well, you will have to get your budget higher than what you expected. This is a date not a shop, where you can save money on bigger purchase. So try to get enough cash for a smooth-flowing date time.

3. The boorish guy

If you are going to brag about how many women you have scored, and how you check out women on street, then you are definitely a boorish guy. This guy will never respect women, and make them feel as another treasure hunt.

Why it’s so annoying for women: women are never going to date a man who constantly flirts with the waitress, just to prove that he is better than others. If you continue this behavior, then she is going to be the first one on your list to hate you.

How to overcome this behavior: start respecting women, and learn to show that respect in front of them. Make them feel special not because you want to score with them, but for that fact that they are not just trophies waiting to be won.

2. The Arrogant Guy

This guy is full of arrogance and ego. All those who are beneath him will be treated with rudeness. He might not be rude with the women he is dating, but he will not be the same with others around him.

Why it’s so annoying for women: a woman is always attentive on a date, so she will instantly catch your arrogance towards other people. She would never like to spend time with someone, who might show the possibility of being rude with her at some point of life. Women like men who are gentle and soft spoken with others too.

How to overcome this behavior: if you can’t overcome your ego, then you must at least try to hide it in front of you date, because she is not so dumb to ignore your arrogance.

1. The predictable guy

This guy is the perfect rule-book follower. He will never do anything which is not there is the general dating guideline. He is never going to surprise a woman with anything creative.

Why it’s so annoying for women: women are always looking for something special and creative. They know about the general moves a man can think off, so they want something different and out-of-box. If you are too predictable, then your date will simply get bored to death.

How to overcome this behavior: well, you can always get new ideas from internet, or you can ask your friends for some dating tips. Mix up things and surprise her. Call her when she is never going to expect a call from you and ask her out. If you want to get things moving, then you must learn to surprise a woman.

If you are not seeking long term relationship, then you can visit, which is definitely the best casual online dating website. This website is loaded with real members waiting for others. You can find your perfect match here without spending too much time and money. As they say, great things come in small packages.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headline News

How Canadian churches are helping their communities cope with the wildfires



As wildfires burn across Canada, churches are finding ways to support their members and the broader community directly impacted by the crisis.

According to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre, as of June 13, there are 462 active fires across Canada – and 236 of them classified as out of control fires.

Whether it’s through phone calls or donations to community members, here’s how a few churches across Canada are handling active wildfires and the aftermath in their regions.

Westwood Hills, N.S.: St. Nicholas Anglican Church

In Nova Scotia, St. Nicholas Anglican Church and other churches in the area are collecting money for grocery cards to give to families impacted by the Tantallon wildfire. 

Right outside of Halifax, N.S., the Tantallon wildfire destroyed 151 homes. More than 16,000 people evacuated the area due to the fire.

The fire is now considered contained, but Tanya Moxley, the treasurer at St. Nicholas is organizing efforts to get grocery gift cards into the hands of impacted families.

As of June 12, four churches in the area – St. Nicholas, Parish of French Village, St Margaret of Scotland and St John the Evangelist – raised nearly $3,500. The money will be split for families’ groceries between five schools in the area impacted by the wildfire.

Moxley said she felt driven to raise this money after she heard the principal of her child’s school was using his own money to buy groceries for impacted families in their area.

“[For] most of those people who were evacuated, the power was off in their subdivision for three, four or five days,” she said. “Even though they went home and their house was still standing, the power was off and they lost all their groceries.”

Moxley said many people in the area are still “reeling” from the fires. She said the church has an important role to help community members during this time.

“We’re called to feed the hungry and clothe the naked and house the homeless and all that stuff, right? So this is it. This is like where the rubber hits the road.”

Continue Reading

Headline News

Is it ever OK to steal from a grocery store?



Mythologized in the legend of Robin Hood and lyricized in Les Misérables, it’s a debate as old as time: is it ever permissible to steal food? And if so, under what conditions? Now, amid Canada’s affordability crisis, the dilemma has extended beyond theatrical debate and into grocery stores.

Although the idea that theft is wrong is both a legally enshrined and socially accepted norm, the price of groceries can also feel criminally high to some — industry data shows that grocery stores can lose between $2,000 and $5,000 a week on average from theft. According to Statistics Canada, most grocery item price increases surged by double digits between 2021 and 2022. To no one’s surprise, grocery store theft is reportedly on the rise as a result. And if recent coverage of the issue rings true, some Canadians don’t feel bad about shoplifting. But should they?

Kieran Oberman, an associate professor of philosophy at the London School of Economics and Political Science in the United Kingdom, coined the term “re-distributive theft” in his 2012 paper “Is Theft Wrong?” In simplest terms, redistributive theft is based on the idea that people with too little could ethically take from those who have too much.

“Everybody, when they think about it, accepts that theft is sometimes permissible if you make the case extreme enough,” Oberman tells me over Zoom. “The question is, when exactly is it permissible?”

Almost no one, Oberman argues, believes the current distribution of wealth across the world is just. We have an inkling that theft is bad, but that inequality is too. As more and more Canadians feel the pinch of inflation, grocery store heirs accumulate riches — Loblaw chair and president Galen Weston, for instance, received a 55 percent boost in compensation in 2022, taking in around $8.4 million for the year. Should someone struggling with rising prices feel guilty when they, say, “forget” to scan a bundle of zucchini?
Continue Reading

Headline News

The homeless refugee crisis in Toronto illustrates Canada’s broken promises



UPDATE 07/18/2023: A coalition of groups arranged a bus to relocate refugees to temporarily stay at a North York church on Monday evening, according to CBC, CP24 and Toronto Star reports.

Canadians live in a time of threadbare morality. Nowhere is this more obvious than in Toronto’s entertainment district, where partygoers delight in spending disposable income while skirting refugees sleeping on sidewalks. The growing pile of luggage at the downtown corner of Peter and Richmond streets resembles the lost baggage section at Pearson airport but is the broken-hearted terminus at the centre of a cruel city.

At the crux of a refugee funding war between the municipal and federal governments are those who have fled persecution for the promise of Canada’s protection. Until June 1, asylum seekers used to arrive at the airport and be sent to Toronto’s Streets to Homes Referral Assessment Centre at 129 Peter St. in search of shelter beds. Now, Toronto’s overcrowded shelter system is closed to these newcomers, so they sleep on the street.

New mayor Olivia Chow pushed the federal government Wednesday for at least $160 million to cope with the surge of refugees in the shelter system. She rightly highlights that refugees are a federal responsibility. In response, the department of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada points to hundreds of millions in dollars already allocated to cities across Canada through the Interim Housing Assistance Program, while Ontario says it has given nearly $100 million to organizations that support refugees. But these efforts are simply not enough to deliver on Canada’s benevolent promise to the world’s most vulnerable.

The lack of federal generosity and finger-pointing by the city has orchestrated a moral crisis. It’s reminiscent of the crisis south of the border, where Texas governor Greg Abbott keeps bussing migrants to cities located in northern Democratic states. Without the necessary resources, information, and sometimes the language skills needed to navigate the bureaucratic mazes, those who fled turbulent homelands for Canada have become political pawns.

But Torontonians haven’t always been this callous.

In Ireland Park, at Lake Ontario’s edge, five statues of gaunt and grateful refugees gaze at their new home: Toronto circa 1847. These statues honour a time when Toronto, with a population of only 20,000 people, welcomed 38,500 famine-stricken migrants from Ireland. It paralleled the “Come From Away” event of 9/11 in Gander, N.L., where the population doubled overnight, and the people discovered there was indeed more than enough for all. It was a time when the city lived up to its moniker as “Toronto, The Good.”

Now, as a wealthy city of three million people, the city’s residents are tasked with supporting far fewer newcomers. Can we not recognize the absurdity in claiming scarcity?

Continue Reading